5 ms·
this is simply the best thing to happen to a windows pc. seriously, adobe reader is ABSOLUTE trash as compared to sumatra. every time i see someone's pc, i inv
by 2Gkashmiri 4y ago
this is simply the best thing to happen to a windows pc. seriously, adobe reader is ABSOLUTE trash as compared to sumatra. every time i see someone's pc, i involuntarily install sumatra, remove adobe reader
- enriquto 4y agoWhat does it add to plain mupdf (on which it seems to be based)? I love the clean, elegant interface of mupdf, and I can't imagine how could you ever improve on that.
- kjksf 4y agoLots and lots of additional features. More formats supported, more view options, remembers the history of files, command palette to quickly access all functionality, way more keyboard shortucts, customizable keyboard shortucts, more customizability of the UI. Maybe I shouldn't comment on the competition but mupdf on windows is very bare bones.
- GoblinSlayer 4y agoAs I understand, with html, mupdf tries to support all web technologies?
- maskros 4y agoNo. MuPDF only supports a limited subset of HTML5 and CSS to support basic EPUB and FictionBook2.
- dartharva 4y agoThe pre-CC Adobe Reader XI functions pretty much the same as Sumatra and doesn't have those anti-features
- 2Gkashmiri 4y agosumatra is like 2 MB install
- YPPH 4y agoAdobe Reader XI reached end-of-life of on 15 October 2017. [0] It has not received security updates for nearly five years. Security updates are very important for a PDF reader, particularly Adobe's. [1] I would advise you not to use it, unless it is to open trusted PDF files you created yourself. [0] https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/kb/end-of-support-acrobat-xi-reader-xi.html https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/kb/end-of-support-acrobat-xi... [1] https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-53/product_id-497/Adobe-Acrobat-Reader.html https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-53/p...
- instagraham 4y agoAt what point will Adobe designers realise that most of us would rather experience knife wounds than use Adobe Reader? It is an objectively worse experience to almost every single PDF reader including Chrome. I'd rather get stabbed every time I use SumatraPDF than use Adobe Reader.
- bambax 4y agoI agree with you on Adobe Reader but I think Adobe doesn't care one bit. Somehow they have managed to entrench themselves in the enterprise document workflow.
- encryptluks2 4y agoSo you remove a full-featured product, albeit a bloated one, for one that has very limited functionality. So next time they go to sign a PDF or whatever they are going to say... hmmm, this person uninstalled something I actually use.
- 2Gkashmiri 4y agoeh, people dont have to "Sign" a pdf, there are dozens of online software to do just that.
- circularfoyers 4y agoMany people aren't willing to do this when the document contains sensitive information.
- encryptluks2 4y agoSo upload sensitive information to a random third-party to sign a document? No thanks
- acheron 4y agoNo. Anything that requires signing is not getting uploaded to a random web service.
- marcodiego 4y agoFor everyone who needs: JSignPDF[1]. FLOSS multi platform software to sign PDF's. [1] http://jsignpdf.sourceforge.net/ http://jsignpdf.sourceforge.net/
- runarberg 4y agoIt’s been over a decade since I used adobe reader (currently a Linux user, and sumatra user when I had windows). And I honestly don’t remember what made adobe reader bad (I just remember that it was bad). Do you care to explain what it is specifically about adobe reader that is so bad compared to Sumatra?