3 ms·

I think that is a pretty baseless claim, even more so given that the project had a complete leadership change only 2 years ago. There is a lot of interest in re

I think that is a pretty baseless claim, even more so given that the project had a complete leadership change only 2 years ago. There is a lot of interest in revamping the internals of Redis while still trying to maintain the original tenets that established Redis. There isn't much justification for saying it could only be changed from the outside when, AFAIK, you didn't try to engage with the system at all.

romange 4y ago
Believe me, I kinda tried to engage with the system. Maybe a bit different system ;) I based my clain on my personal experience and it's not related to Redis specifically. People are people. They become defensive when something new tries to replace old views. Usually it does not work when you have no leverage and challenge the status quo within the system that has no good reason to change i.e loose money and margins due to increased efficiency of the underlying infrastructure. It's a classic innovator's dillema. Imho...