4 ms·
I think at this point of time and the state of this 14 years old project the status quo can be changed only from the outside. If chrome was not born you would
by romange 4y ago
I think at this point of time and the state of this 14 years old project the status quo can be changed only from the outside.
If chrome was not born you would still use microsoft explorer with aspx sites.
- reconditerose 4y agoI think that is a pretty baseless claim, even more so given that the project had a complete leadership change only 2 years ago. There is a lot of interest in revamping the internals of Redis while still trying to maintain the original tenets that established Redis. There isn't much justification for saying it could only be changed from the outside when, AFAIK, you didn't try to engage with the system at all.
- romange 4y agoBelieve me, I kinda tried to engage with the system. Maybe a bit different system ;) I based my clain on my personal experience and it's not related to Redis specifically. People are people. They become defensive when something new tries to replace old views. Usually it does not work when you have no leverage and challenge the status quo within the system that has no good reason to change i.e loose money and margins due to increased efficiency of the underlying infrastructure. It's a classic innovator's dillema. Imho...
- teach 4y agoI just want to say that this comment alone has put me off looking into Dragonflydb.
- romange 4y agoSorry to hear that. But let me quote antirez response from this topic: "...But I think that Redis may go fully threaded soon or later, and perhaps your project may accelerate the process". Lets at least agree that if Dragonfly will push redis to evolve, it's a good thing.