3 ms·
I found this explanation pretty post-hoc: "nobody depicts a moose in stained glass. A man scrying the heavens through a telescope is exactly the sort of dignif
by sacrosancty 4y ago
I found this explanation pretty post-hoc:
"nobody depicts a moose in stained glass. A man scrying the heavens through a telescope is exactly the sort of dignified thing people make stained glass windows about. A moose isn’t. So DALL-E loses confidence and decides you don’t really mean it should be stained glass style."
If the styles of the moose and the man were reversed, you could use the exact same explanation but end with "So DALL-E decides you don't really want the moose to be in stained glass style.".
- pvg 4y agoA google image search turns up endless flocks of stained glass meese as well.
- quickthrower2 4y agoFlocks of stained glass moose
- gspr 4y agoNo. This is a bug in English. The parent post just fixes it. It should clearly be meese.
- quickthrower2 4y agoWhy not mooses then?
- gspr 4y agoClearly then it also has to be gooses instead of geese ;-)
- quickthrower2 4y agoIf we are fixing it all… Logically you can distinguish between one, two, etc… and many with the word one, two, etc… and many. So there is no need for pluralised word. And we are back to moose!
- pvg 4y agour fase is a stained glass moose