What I've heard from the many people who talk about right to repair on YouTube (channels like LTT, EEVBlog, and of course Louis Rossmann), is that they aren't a

What I've heard from the many people who talk about right to repair on YouTube (channels like LTT, EEVBlog, and of course Louis Rossmann), is that they aren't asking for laws to restrict how products can be designed. A law like that is highly unlikely to pass and would seriously anger a lot of people if it did. It looks like the reason for this mismatch in opinions is because repair.org is not associated with Rossmann. To me, their existence is going to hurt the chances of right to repair, because people will point to their goals as a reason to not consider the part/version of right to repair that should be much less controversial (in a relative sense. any regulations are controversial just due to being regulations)