4 ms·
I didn't mention desertification, but habitability - I meant to imply "inhabitable by unprotected humans." The Eocene saw a thermal maximum in which global mea
by EForEndeavour 4y ago
I didn't mention desertification, but habitability - I meant to imply "inhabitable by unprotected humans."
The Eocene saw a thermal maximum in which global mean temperature increased by about 6 ºC, and a much wetter climate: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleocene%E2%80%93Eocene_Thermal_Maximum#Evidence_for_global_warming https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleocene%E2%80%93Eocene_Therm...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet-bulb_temperature https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet-bulb_temperature:
> The theoretical limit to human survival for more than a few hours in the shade, even with unlimited water, is a wet-bulb temperature of 35 °C (95 °F)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-021-00695-3 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-021-00695-3:
> Limiting global warming to 1.5 °C will prevent most of the tropics from reaching a TW of 35 °C, the limit of human adaptation.
- Geee 4y agoFair point. How about animals? It seems that many modern mammals, including primates, evolved and thrived during the Eocene. Most of the world today is too cold for humans living without protection, so I'm not completely buying that it would be worse than today. It might require moving around a bit, but not a total catastrophe.