4 ms·
For those of use who live close to these camps, "deal with" is the correct phrasing. As much as I want to be empathetic to people who need treatment for addicti
by panda888888 4y ago
For those of use who live close to these camps, "deal with" is the correct phrasing. As much as I want to be empathetic to people who need treatment for addiction or mental health support, there's a point where the camps begin to severely damage the community.
Examples I've dealt with personally: human shit on the front steps of my building, almost daily. Kids can't play outside because there are needles on the ground. Multiple neighbors' catalytic converters stolen, sometimes multiple times. Stolen cars without license plates. Entire encampments catching on fire. Bikes stolen from locked garages. Neighbors threatened with guns.
Where I live, there's a large part of the homeless population who refuses help from social services and won't go to shelters. I get it, shelters are shitty, but these people prefer to do drugs. I'm not the type of person who wants to call for forced institutionalization, but that almost feels like it would be more humane than the conditions these people are living in today.
This isn't a NIMBY issue, and until you've experienced it right outside your own house, you may not understand how bad the conditions can be.
- lupire 4y agoIt is quite a NIMBY issue when someone like PP wants encampments but not in their backyard
- panda888888 4y agoNo, my point is that these encampments are so bad that they shouldn't be allowed anywhere. (I'm talking about the big encampments with 5+ tents or RVs, not 1 dude with a sleeping bag.)