4 ms·
That's not how it works here at all. First, universal insurance isn't "freeloading." Then, drug addiction is treated like an illness like anything else and ever
by guerrilla 4y ago
That's not how it works here at all. First, universal insurance isn't "freeloading." Then, drug addiction is treated like an illness like anything else and everyone is entitled to help for it. Drug use is entirely illegal.
> Why shouldn't individual suffer the consequences of their actions?
The consequences of being laid off? Getting cancer? Having schizophrenia? Being an addict? They do suffer the consequences of all those things, none of which they caused and they get help with them.
- thegrimmest 4y agoHelp is fundamentally a voluntary action - you ask for it and the helper decides what help to give and how to give it. In other words, charity. This isn't what you're describing, you're describing compulsion and entitlement. If you need help, you should ask for it, and if others want to help you, they will. Otherwise, your misfortunes and your failures are entirely your own to deal with.
- guerrilla 4y agoIt's literally insurance. Making up stories about how our system works isn't going to change that.
- thegrimmest 4y agoInsurance is also voluntary - you can opt in/out and shop around. We have that too. I think you're proposing some mandatory "I make bad decisions" insurance that we all have to pay into. No thanks, I'll opt out.
- guerrilla 4y agoInsurance can be voluntary or not. In any case, it is voluntary here. We're a democracy and chose this because it's good for us. We can also shop around. In contrast to the US though, ours is affordable for every resident.
- thegrimmest 4y agooh yeah? how do you opt out of your social safety net exactly?
- guerrilla 4y agoNobody's holding you hostage...
- thegrimmest 4y agoI'm not sure I agree - compulsory participation/cooperation in the only place I have a right to exist is exactly "holding me hostage"