3 ms·
No, please let's not raise the idea that metatron.substack.com's non-expert interpretation of data is a waste of valuable expert time! Wait, I should look at t
by throwaway5752 4y ago
No, please let's not raise the idea that metatron.substack.com's non-expert interpretation of data is a waste of valuable expert time!
Wait, I should look at the author's (Joel Smalley) self-described qualifications before getting snarky:
Pro bono COVID data analysis for legal challenges and independent media seeking the truth (e.g. Dr Tess Lawrie's letter to the MHRA - https://bit.ly/3FZxpU7 https://bit.ly/3FZxpU7 and Robert Kennedy's book - https://amzn.to/3nMd2mK https://amzn.to/3nMd2mK), shared publicly "for the greater good". https://substack.com/profile/30382446-joel-smalley https://substack.com/profile/30382446-joel-smalley
Yes, it is a waste of time. A reasonable presumption is that people are morons or liars unless shown otherwise.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- zmgsabst 4y agoI got it: you can only make ad hominems, not address facts about Australia’s death numbers. > A reasonable presumption is that people are morons or liars unless shown otherwise. Is that confirmed when the only argument those people offer is ad hominems?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]