> This is the kind of dismissive, unhelpful, and frankly extremely discouraging attitude that is slowly killing emacs. Emacs seems to be doing just fine if not

> This is the kind of dismissive, unhelpful, and frankly extremely discouraging attitude that is slowly killing emacs. Emacs seems to be doing just fine if not thriving. > Instead of taking responsibility for the fact that emacs is incredibly slow because of poor architectural decisions (like an insistence to not using fast native libraries and an incredibly slow language) For me, Emacs is both incredibly fast and incredibly stable. For an "Emacs user and package developer of 20 years", you seem either too quick to jump to conclusions or are still barely scratching the surface of what's possible which makes me question the depth of your expertise and/or how efficiently your time with Emacs was invested.