3 ms·

Is there any catch or gotcha for using this as a drop in replacement for Redis?

• tlarkworthy 4y ago
  I can see it's missing some important commands like WATCH, and maybe the WAL for high durability contexts.
  • romange 4y ago
    If you see that important command are missing, pks open an issue and we will prioritize their implementation.
• Strom 4y ago
  A lot less features. If you don't care about the missing features, then it might be a completely reasonable replacement.
  • romange 4y ago
    I've been working on DF for the last 6 months and I implemented ~130 commands. It's still missing about 40% of the commands to reach parity with v5/v6. I will continue working on DF. Primary/Secondary replication is my next milestone.
    • treis 4y ago
      How apples to apples is the performance comparison given these missing commands?
      • romange 4y ago
        Those commands wont affect the design of the df, hence they wont affect the performance. Its just work that needs to be done.
• deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
• jkmcf 4y ago
  It's only at release 0.1 so I'd let them bake a little longer! Looks awesome so far, though!
• thayne 4y ago
  The license is different. Redis core is BSD 3 clause, which is a permissive open source license. Dragonflydb uses the Business Source License, with some additional use grants. Depending on your situation, that could be an impediment.