As you point out, it creates masters of a single rabbit hole, with all it's false dens, escapes etc. Back in the craft days this was common, people would appren

As you point out, it creates masters of a single rabbit hole, with all it's false dens, escapes etc. Back in the craft days this was common, people would apprentice and down a hole they went. Then came bulk parallel education, where people emerged with credentials of their rabbit holes mastered. (read, write, math....) and people were hired as such and then began the meat and potatoes of their new job. It is much the same with degreed education, but with a lot more granularity that increased as your degrees grew - postdocs etc, papers published etc. So we now enter the area of the internet autodidact - how to prove what you know? What if you always hated partial differential equations = never ever studied. Same with statistics or the analysis of a segment of DNA by modern voltage drop capillary methods - hated all those. In effect how to you answer a job ad with granular evidence of what you can do? Will this end up creating a number of brilliant people with holes in their CV? How to ID these holes so you can autodidact what you lack and may hate = a hirable person with a CV some HR algorithm allows to deal with the AI that acts as the human screener so you get an interview? There will also be cheat AI's that are tasked with getting your BS CV past these initial screens in the hope that your high level BS AI can get you hired - sight unseen? There are huge numbers of people with well documented, fully faked CV's already beating down HR doors in response to their ads in hopes of getting some sort of job.... doubt me? ask a few high tech HR people which face this thicket of false AND litigious applicants on a daily basis.