The article seems to be using an inaccurate visualisation of a model (RCP8.5) which is now 'no longer plausible'[0]. RCP8.5 was considered the 'worst-case' sce

The article seems to be using an inaccurate visualisation of a model (RCP8.5) which is now 'no longer plausible'[0]. RCP8.5 was considered the 'worst-case' scenario and projected 3.3 to 5.7 in 2100, not 2050 as the graphic shows. [0] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-51281986 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-51281986