3 ms·

"The right to privacy shall not be infringed" bill would be a good start. She can formulate it, Schumer can demand to vote on it. The bill can include a provisi

• salawat 4y ago
  >The right to privacy shall not be infringed Yes, that wording has worked so well in the past. >It's not the government doing it. >It's not infringement if you have to do some paperwork and pay a tax first. >It effects interstate commerce even if it doesn't involve an entity in another state directly. I laud the attempt, but unfortunately you are going to have to get much more explicit. The right to personal privacy shall not be infringed by any actor. No business that engages in a circumvention of this prohibition shall be considered to be operating in good faith unless X, Y, and Z tests are passed. And in reality, you will see businesses structured such that you must jump through hoops X, Y, and Z must happen. So you'll need an additional clause. Next, you'll end up with a Supreme Court challenge on free speech grounds, as not monetizing customer data will be seen as compelled speech by the government.