> 'anigbrowl is saying that everyone's privacy is violated by private facial recognition deployments constantly, and law enforcement's alternatives --- which ar

> 'anigbrowl is saying that everyone's privacy is violated by private facial recognition deployments constantly, and law enforcement's alternatives --- which are already universally accepted by our jurisprudence --- are more invasive. And I am saying that instead of allowing law enforcement to use this technologies as well (because hey, everyone is using them), I'm saying we should instead limit everyone else from using it, as well. Especially big corporations like Google and Facebook. >you appear to not believe in the concept of law enforcement at all. I never said that. What I've been saying is that law enforcement is merely reactive. It doesn't solve problems, it merely fights the symptoms. The true problems are an entire generation of disillusioned people, a failing society reigned by corporate greed and kept in check by false hopes and dreams (yes, I'm talking about the American one). You have to fight these, not (just) the things they inevitably produce.