4 ms·
And they appealed and then Twitter decided to uphold the decision. What is wrong with an AI doing some flagging? I've seen plenty of people say "killed" "kill
by foxes 4y ago
And they appealed and then Twitter decided to uphold the decision.
What is wrong with an AI doing some flagging?
I've seen plenty of people say "killed" "kill" etc on Twitter in the context of news stories. Those accounts don't get banned. Sample size N=1 for an AI flagging your weird tweet, even if it was okay, out of thousands of tweets doesn't seem a bad hit rate.
Let's also not ignore the tweet and the thread is a really shitty joke. Then you go on to make a huge deal out of it? Just delete your dumb joke and move on.
- lapcat 4y ago> And they appealed and then Twitter decided to uphold the decision. Does Twitter ever not uphold its own decisions? I have serious doubts whether an intelligent human ever looks at these cases. > Let's also not ignore the tweet and the thread is a really shitty joke. Then you go on to make a huge deal out of it? Just delete your dumb joke and move on. There are several problems. One: "By clicking Delete, you acknowledge that your Tweet violated the Twitter Rules." This is a forced confession of an innocent person. You don't see a problem with that? Another problem: You're forced to hand over your phone number to Twitter if you haven't yet. The same thing happened to me last year. https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/twitter4.html https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/twitter4.html Just a few days ago, Twitter was fined (not enough) by the FTC for abusing the 2FA phone numbers of Twitter users for advertising purposes. https://www.engadget.com/ftc-twitter-targeted-advertising-215320214.html https://www.engadget.com/ftc-twitter-targeted-advertising-21...