> Code review is peer review, the key agent of the scientific method. I just can’t abide a process that doesn’t include peer review. The key agent of the scien

> Code review is peer review, the key agent of the scientific method. I just can’t abide a process that doesn’t include peer review. The key agent of the scientific method is making predictions and comparing them to reality. In other words, you should test if your code actually does what it should do. If so, peer review does not necessarily offer any net benefit. If you absolutely insist on code review, then you do not belong on the team I am envisioning, which is totally fine. Like I said, the approach has obvious risks, but that is often a tradeoff worth making.