> You don’t fire someone over one incident. But if someone declines to internalize the feedback and continues to make PRs that are very far from acceptable or e

> You don’t fire someone over one incident. But if someone declines to internalize the feedback and continues to make PRs that are very far from acceptable or even reviewable, yes that is grounds for termination. I agree; it's just that the way OP phrased it ("I was let go once for having too many commits in a PR", emphasis mine) made it seem like it was just one incident. Unless it was something completely egregious like a 50-commit PR to make a one-line change, I don't see how firing is a reasonable response. Which is why I want to hear the rest of the story :)