I agree. A volume of commits to get to a workable/reviewable PR is in relation to the code quality and ease of change of the codebase. If I made 20 some odd com

I agree. A volume of commits to get to a workable/reviewable PR is in relation to the code quality and ease of change of the codebase. If I made 20 some odd commits to get to a good working PR (which you compare with develop, or main, or whatnot) you only see the complete change view, not the individual. I think it’s something to discuss. Why did it take so many commits? Is our testing broken? Is our runtime broken? Or is it the fact that we programmed in a lot of hard coded values that only work on the codebase owners machine? Hmmmm…