4 ms·

No because 4chan is heckin' problematic, ya'll.

• busterarm 4y ago
  And Discord isn't? Isn't this the same Discord whose own trust and safety team leadership were sharing "cub content"[1] on private servers? [1]: Cub content is the furry version of CP, for the uninitiated.
  • ogurechny 4y ago
    Indecent photographs of little puppies?
    • busterarm 4y ago
      No, sexually explicit artwork depicting sex with puppies, kittens, etc. If you were to do the same thing with children it would be extremely illegal in any civilized country. Also this kind of imagery leads directly to animal sexual abuse, which is a huge but little-talked-about problem. It's despicable and has no place in our society.
      • ogurechny 4y ago
        Whew, I'm so glad that I live in an extremely civilized country that already has an extremely zealous government agency that blocks whole websites for hosting anything like that, up to and including '90s Simpsons porn comics drawn in Paint (this is not a joke). It protects me and it protects my society. However, what you described does not seem to be a “furry version of child porn”.
        • stavros 4y ago
          More of a child version of furry porn, really.
        • busterarm 4y ago
          Consider that you're arguing on a spectrum of the acceptability of adolescents in sexual situations. You may want to engage with that idea, but as for me, fuck no, fucking never and fuck anyone who stands for it.