3 ms·
Fun to see this here again. Love the controversy and discussion this brings. I wrote it in a good humor and I still giggle at the some of reactionary response
by binarymax 4y ago
Fun to see this here again. Love the controversy and discussion this brings. I wrote it in a good humor and I still giggle at the some of reactionary responses. “How dare you call this a falsehoods list” and so forth.
Anyway things are getting better now. More people got into search and info retrieval since I dropped this list. And there’s a great growing community out there of people who find and adore the problem space. For those who enjoy reading, I’m glad you do! For the people who don’t, … :)
Happy searchin’!
- hnbad 4y agoJust a PSA: "reactionary" doesn't mean "in reaction to". It specifically refers to opposition to social change ("reject modernity, embrace tradition"), and opposition to liberalism and progressivism in particular, like a conservative over-correction (not just rejecting further changes but a desire to revert to an idealized previous state that never was). Of course the descriptivist in me would say that "reactionary" can also just mean "in reaction to" if enough people just use it that way and that people have picked up the political term through cultural osmosis and apply it to reactions in general validates this meaning, so make of that what you will.
- m_mueller 4y agoI guess social politics are not the only field where you can have a progressive - conservative divide, each in their literal sense (note: these do IMO not cleanly map to political parties in general, i.e. you could be a conservative left or a progressive right). Thus you can be a reactionary in your field of profession in how you react to criticism.