3 ms·
The Chrome 91 branch, which (according to the article) the client is built upon, was released in May last year. That’s not great… …but not terrible either. I tr
by nemetroid 4y ago
The Chrome 91 branch, which (according to the article) the client is built upon, was released in May last year. That’s not great… …but not terrible either. I trust that, in due time, Discord will update to a newer version.
As for Flatpak… Fine by me, but don’t make it the only option, as suggested by this article. Some of us prefer having an up-to-date operating system with shims to support software that require older libraries, rather than the other way around.
- Avamander 4y agoThe amount of vulnerabilities in Chrome so old is immense, it's very much terrible.
- smoldesu 4y agoVery much agree on the Flatpak side of things. GNOME has been using it to promotw their own EEE philosophy, which is why I avoid it like the plague.
- phendrenad2 4y agoI guess by EEE you mean GNOME is pushing for apps to use Flatpak, then once they do, pushing for the Flatpak version to be the main (or only) version. I don't think that really fits the EEE model because any Linux distro (or even Mac or Windows or BSD) can ship Flatpak.