4 ms·
> solving these problems... where they happen (would also be much cheaper) You assert that it's much cheaper to solve these problems without moving the people.
by fennecfoxen 4y ago
> solving these problems... where they happen (would also be much cheaper)
You assert that it's much cheaper to solve these problems without moving the people. It is not nearly so cut-and-dry.
When someone seeks to flee their homeland for Europe or America, it's generally because something is very wrong where they are coming from. Often, the problem includes some sort of kleptocratic, warmongering, authoritarian, or incompetent government. (Sometimes it is not strictly government — e.g. terrorism, cartels.)
It's often much easier to move people than reform institutions, and open migration worldwide would be a reform worth about $78 trilllllllllllllion. https://www.economist.com/the-world-if/2017/07/13/a-world-of-free-movement-would-be-78-trillion-richer https://www.economist.com/the-world-if/2017/07/13/a-world-of...
- tomp 4y agoThere's 1.2 billion people in Africa. Good luck moving all of them. The only realistic solution is reforming institutions where the people are.
- guerrilla 4y agoJust curious, did you read the article before responding? Then I'm wondering, why do you expect all 1.2 billion Africans to flee Africa? That seems very unrealistic.