3 ms·

Bad developers are still not a valid argument against SPAs.

• Taywee 4y ago
  Why not? "You have to reimplement a huge amount of current and future behaviors that just work for MPAs" is definitely an argument against SPAs. That's extra work, extra potential for bugs, extra potential for accessibility problems.
• dempseye 4y ago
  That's like saying bad trapeze artists are not a valid argument for safety nets.
• RHSeeger 4y ago
  If it is more common for functionality to be broken in an SPA than in a non-SPA, then that most certainly _is_ a valid argument against SPAs (from a user perspective). It's not an argument that all SPAs are bad. Rather, that I prefer non-SPA implementations because I can generally assume that it will have fewer bugs/annoyances in using it.
• layer8 4y ago
  It sort-of is if bad developers are less likely to wreck havoc with MPAs. Also, I don’t think that back-button breakage automatically indicates incompetent developers (although I tend to swear at them).