5 ms·
Still amazed daily at how many people eagerly line up to work at Facebook and Google, two companies engaged in mass fuckery with long-term harm to the entire po
by stakkur 4y ago
Still amazed daily at how many people eagerly line up to work at Facebook and Google, two companies engaged in mass fuckery with long-term harm to the entire population.
- mistrial9 4y agoone of those two did not start that way
- b112 4y agoNeither did.
- mistrial9 4y agoyou mean when I toured the new Facebook campus in California, with a data science group from Berkeley, and the Facebook guide stood on the stage and showed us on a thirty foot screen, that any one of us can make a map-reduce job in a certain format, Facebook will sell us info on any way to slice the hundreds of social tags and categories they had mined.. that was perfectly OK? I think the example the guide gave was "bowlers in the upper midwest" .. it was made clear that we could make a job submisison and be sold data on those people. Someone asked if law enforcement was a customer and the answer way "yes we do business with all branches of law enforcement".
- throwaway6093 4y agoThey don’t sell the data, they sell targeted ads.
- ocdtrekkie 4y agoThere's going to be a point where choosing to work at Google in 2020+ is going to be a black mark on your entire career. Nobody has the excuse of claiming they still don't know what's going on. If you work there, you chose to put profit over society. And at least in my hopes and dreams, someday that will cost you a job.
- skinnymuch 4y agoWhat amazing companies are most people working at that don’t exploit their workers or society? Almost every one puts profit over society to some significant degree. We live in a hyper capitalist society. Being on the side of this hyper capitalist society as the majority of people are, is the problem.
- edgyquant 4y agoThis is ridiculous. Working at one of the most cutting edge companies solving problems at global scale will not be a black mark on your career.
- ocdtrekkie 4y agoGoogle is neither cutting edge nor solving problems at global scale. They are an adtech company that produces ho-hum messaging apps that abuses human rights as defined by the United Nations as their primary business model. Choosing to work there today means choosing to hurt society for personal gain, full stop.
- otachack 4y agoOstracizing friends that work in these big companies is no simple task. And I wouldn't exactly put all the blame on them when society and capitalism has built the platform for these companies to succeed. I would accept friends and acquaintances recognizing their participation, as well as my own as a user of some products, and observe plus work together to figure a way out of this mess (regulations, break up of big tech?) One also must recognize the philanthropic arms of these companies. They may be some attempt to balance the shit they're doing.
- tester756 4y ago>nor solving problems at global scale. if they don't, then who does?
- charcircuit 4y agoBoth of these companies improve the lives of billions of people. You are acting biased if you purposefully ignore that.
- mtlmtlmtlmtl 4y agoDo you have some source to corroborate that Google and Facebook have a net positive effect on the lives of billions of people? Making false assumptions is also a way of acting biased.
- scarface74 4y agoFacebook has allowed anyone to spread video capturing police misconduct that the mainstream press has ignored for decades. Google with Android and ChromeOS has put computing devices in the hands of people who could never afford the alternative and YouTube has allowed anyone to publish video. I myself find Google’s products second rate and I prefer business models where I give the company money and they give me stuff. But I realize that a $1200 iPhone Pro Max is an indulgence that many walking around with a $35 unsubsidized phone can’t afford.
- mtlmtlmtlmtl 4y agoSure, it's helped people spread some information. It's also helped people massively disseminate misinformation though. What I asked for was some corroboration that there is a net positive.
- skinnymuch 4y agoWithout Android, would WebOS and other mobile OSes never have come out? Do the people using $35 phones care it’s Android vs what ever other OSes they’d have if it never existed? There were video sites besides YouTube. YouTube cornered the market. That doesn’t make them special. All the examples are one brand cornering a market without having done any exceptional innovation that would be incredibly missed without them. Cornering markets is almost never a net positive for people. I should probably say it never is.
- scarface74 4y agoYou’re amazed that people willingly work at companies where they can get paid more than 90% of American straight out of college?
- shadowgovt 4y agoHaving worked at one of those, I can give you some insight. ... They think exactly the opposite. Google even has an estimate of how many lives their services save per year on average. Privacy concerns become extremely secondary when you're stranded in the woods and all rescuers have on your location is the last time your GPS-equipped smartphone pinged. Googlers think of themselves as working on systems like that.