3 ms·
This will evolve. I think 100% remote is great for some people (small children, busy schedules, health issues) but many people would also benefit from being wit
by ChicagoDave 4y ago
This will evolve. I think 100% remote is great for some people (small children, busy schedules, health issues) but many people would also benefit from being with their teams.
The change I'd like to see is some sort of geographically centric pod office where it's not mandatory, but a team lead could say, "We need two days at Pod X to run through A, B, C initiatives."
No one is required to arbitrarily attend a physical office, but rather very task and team specific meetings.
I think many people that are against that arbitrary return would be open to task/team scheduled gatherings.
- ipaddr 4y agoAny in-person gatherings are red flags. For a party, to hear the ceo speak or for a team building meeting.
- ChicagoDave 4y agoA company has every right to build its culture, so I'd disagree with this. It's really the "you must be at a desk in our office for 8 hours just because" part that most people object to.