4 ms·

Well, if you go a long diatribe "not trusting your fellow Greeks", it implies you trust other people more for these complex projects.

YeGoblynQueenne 4y ago
It implies nothing of the sort. You're just trying your best to misinterpret what I actually wrote.
- rglullis 4y ago
  You start a whole paragraph saying "you don't trust your fellow Greeks", throws the laundry list of problems with Greek society, then concludes with "before those social problems are solved, we shouldn't build any nuclear reactors on our land". That implies that your problem is specifically with Greece having nuclear plants, and that there are other societies that are capable of managing nuclear reactors on their land. Does it not?
  - YeGoblynQueenne 4y ago
    Nope.
    - rglullis 4y ago
      Then you just want to complain about Greeks. Which is... your prerogative, but not very helpful?
      - deleted 4y ago
        [deleted]
      - deleted 4y ago
        [deleted]
      - YeGoblynQueenne 4y ago
        "not very helpful"? Why? Do you disagree with what I wrote above, about the situation in Greece? Because you said that "Corruption and abuse of power is not just a Greek thing". Not "just" a Greek thing, yes? So you must think that it is a Greek thing. Note, my comment was not only about "corruption and abuse of power", but also about incompetence. See in my comment: "a country were rank incompetence runs rampant". You didn't seem to disagree with that - you only commented about corruption and abuse of power. So which parts of all this do you disagree with? Can you clarify? I'm sorry but I have to confess, I'm very confused by the way you choose to communicate. If instead of attacking an opinion I didn't express, you had taken the time to think carefully about what I acturally wrote, and made a comment about that, you could have spared us both a lot of wasted effort. If you didn't have time to think carefully and you just wanted to express your disagreement or frustration at my comment, you could always just downvote my comment. But if you're going to put time in a discussion, then put enough time in it to avoid confusing everyone, including yourself. If I may.
        rglullis 4y ago
        > So which parts of all this do you disagree with? Can you clarify? I agree that Greece is not the best place to build reactor plants, but I do not agree with the reasons you provided. There are other countries that also have incompetence and corruption - endemic and systemic - and yet they still promote big enterprises, and I don't see how this is an argument against the project in itself.
        YeGoblynQueenne 4y ago
        Thanks for clarifying! And sorry for the delay in replying. I understand now your disagreement. Out of curiousity, what is the reason you don't think Greece is not the best place to build reactor plants?
        rglullis 4y ago
        Just look up at the top of the thread and the very first comment that started this conversation: "It is a country with lots of seismic activity and are in the middle of the Mediterranean."

YeGoblynQueenne 4y ago

It implies nothing of the sort. You're just trying your best to misinterpret what I actually wrote.

rglullis 4y ago
You start a whole paragraph saying "you don't trust your fellow Greeks", throws the laundry list of problems with Greek society, then concludes with "before those social problems are solved, we shouldn't build any nuclear reactors on our land". That implies that your problem is specifically with Greece having nuclear plants, and that there are other societies that are capable of managing nuclear reactors on their land. Does it not?
- YeGoblynQueenne 4y ago
  Nope.
  - rglullis 4y ago
    Then you just want to complain about Greeks. Which is... your prerogative, but not very helpful?
    - deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
    - deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
    - YeGoblynQueenne 4y ago
      "not very helpful"? Why? Do you disagree with what I wrote above, about the situation in Greece? Because you said that "Corruption and abuse of power is not just a Greek thing". Not "just" a Greek thing, yes? So you must think that it is a Greek thing. Note, my comment was not only about "corruption and abuse of power", but also about incompetence. See in my comment: "a country were rank incompetence runs rampant". You didn't seem to disagree with that - you only commented about corruption and abuse of power. So which parts of all this do you disagree with? Can you clarify? I'm sorry but I have to confess, I'm very confused by the way you choose to communicate. If instead of attacking an opinion I didn't express, you had taken the time to think carefully about what I acturally wrote, and made a comment about that, you could have spared us both a lot of wasted effort. If you didn't have time to think carefully and you just wanted to express your disagreement or frustration at my comment, you could always just downvote my comment. But if you're going to put time in a discussion, then put enough time in it to avoid confusing everyone, including yourself. If I may.
      - rglullis 4y ago
        > So which parts of all this do you disagree with? Can you clarify? I agree that Greece is not the best place to build reactor plants, but I do not agree with the reasons you provided. There are other countries that also have incompetence and corruption - endemic and systemic - and yet they still promote big enterprises, and I don't see how this is an argument against the project in itself.
        YeGoblynQueenne 4y ago
        Thanks for clarifying! And sorry for the delay in replying. I understand now your disagreement. Out of curiousity, what is the reason you don't think Greece is not the best place to build reactor plants?
        rglullis 4y ago
        Just look up at the top of the thread and the very first comment that started this conversation: "It is a country with lots of seismic activity and are in the middle of the Mediterranean."