3 ms·
All stars have neutrons. Neutrons are star seeds. The number of neutrons increase as the universe ages. Otherwise the so called big bang would have immediately
by ohiovr 4y ago
All stars have neutrons. Neutrons are star seeds. The number of neutrons increase as the universe ages. Otherwise the so called big bang would have immediately collapsed into a black hole. There are no neutron free zones in the universe except perhaps quasars.
How much dark matter is in the universe according to the experts?
https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/dark-matter/en/ https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/dark-matter/en/
"Dark matter is stuff in space that has gravity, but it is unlike anything scientists have ever seen before. Together, dark matter and dark energy make up 95% of the universe. That only leaves a small 5% for all the matter and energy we know and understand."
From what we see in the sky it is a fairly logical assumption that 95% of the baryonic matter up there are protons and 5% of it is neutrons. There is your missing mass. We only think there is missing mass because of the strange motion of the cosmos doesn't line up with our laws. As a programmer I abhor fudge factors because they don't always work.
Think about black holes sucking in matter. Mass down the the center loses it's electric charge for the most part and becomes like neutrons. Quasars are supposed to be quite massive but it appears mass is leaving them. Perhaps quasars are the exit points of black holes. The mass gets converted from neutral to non neutral somewhere at the edges of the universe.
If I'm right, then the sun and most stars are a heck of a lot more massive than we think they are. Also this would explain why the atmosphere at earth's beginning was so much hotter because the sun was considerably larger due to ongoing neutron-genesis.
Thank you for your time. I'd do the experiment myself if I was able to.
- db48x 4y agoYou’ve built quite an edifice on top of your assumption, but you haven’t actually tested that assumption yet. I think you need to be a lot less certain about your conclusions, since you have no experimental evidence. In fact, you are ignoring quite a lot of experimental evidence as well, which suggests that you like your new idea so much that you are willing to assume that everyone else is blind.
- ohiovr 4y agoThere is no proof of dark matter which nasa is quite fond of stating as literal fact without any experimental proof, or measurement. When I win the lottery which I don't play I'll be sure to make my experiment with liquid hydrogen. Hopefully I don't blow myself up in the process. Even at a winnings of a million dollars I may get closer to unlocking the secret of gravity than the large dadron collider ever will with tens of billions behind it.
- db48x 4y agoNo, there is no experimental proof of dark matter, only puzzling measurements of distant galaxies. Plenty of scientists are looking for alternative explanations, as well as trying to detect dark matter directly. They’ve got some wacky ideas, but none as wacky as your idea that only neutrons have mass.