4 ms·
> It's already widely known that a Tory member's family was receiving government money for PPE. Why don't you cite the specific example then and we can discus
by easytiger 4y ago
> It's already widely known that a Tory member's family was receiving government money for PPE.
Why don't you cite the specific example then and we can discuss it.
> Honestly would if really surprise anyone at this point?
The intellectual dishonesty to use this as an argument is staggering.
- LightG 4y agoYou're probably right that it's better to cite things, especially on what is a US-centric forum. However, as someone in the UK, the corruption that went on here with regards to PPE and many other government contracts is widely known and just a google search away. Sorry - but your faux outrage concerning intellectual dishonesty reads as exactly that ... That people speculate cynically over the actions of the current government is directly a result of the mistrust they have grown in the electorate. Reap it.
- dazc 4y ago'...and just a google search away. Oh, the irony!
- teamonkey 4y ago> Why don't you cite the specific example then and we can discuss it. Top result for [1] [1] https://www.google.com/search?q=a+Tory+member's+family+was+receiving+government+money+for+PPE https://www.google.com/search?q=a+Tory+member's+family+was+r...