3 ms·

Again, it’s so easy to criticize, point out the “problem” and then offer no solution. The “knowledge factory” exists for a reason. The way our society is const

• paskozdilar 4y ago
  > It sounds like the only difference in your example is that these things exist but are not centrally verified to be identical, because apparently diplomas themselves are the problem. Yes, exactly. You are using a diploma as an indicator of knowledge, and you have a diploma-giving machine (university) that gives the diploma to anyone that can pass a test. People cheat the test in order to get the diploma. It will always happen, no matter how intricate you make your tests, because you cannot automate knowledge verification. It isn't a "problem" - it's an "impossibility". And it's one impossibility software companies have gradually started dealing with - most don't care about diplomas anymore, because the correlation between knowledge and having a diploma gets lesser and lesser the more diplomas are printed artificially. So, that is a pretty good solution, too. Remove diplomas altogether, and let employers measure knowledge in a way they seem fit. They will have responsibility for the mistakes of an employee, so it makes sense that they make the criteria. That way, educational institutions will have to make their education useful in the real world, or their reputation will crumble.
  • hnarn 4y ago
    > So, that is a pretty good solution, too. Remove diplomas altogether, and let employers measure knowledge in a way they seem fit. It's not a "pretty good solution", which shows if you start breaking down how you would attempt to achieve this. How do you, first of all, "remove diplomas"? Do you suggest that we fundamentally overturn how our entire society works just to remove cheating? A "diploma", "certification" or whatever you want to call it, can be issued by many different entities: a collection of nation-states, a state itself, non- and for-profit organizations, even individuals. These all have varying degrees of value depending on the trust placed in the issuing body, from a certificate of having completed Bob's Weekend Sales Course to a state-issued certificate to perform a specific type of surgery. First of all, which of these are you saying should be "removed"? Only the ones from universities? All of them? Secondly, how do you remove them? Do you outlaw them? Thirdly, what happens when they're all gone? How do you certify a surgeon?
    • paskozdilar 4y ago
      > How do you, first of all, "remove diplomas"? Very simple - just stop giving them to people and let them be forgotten as a concept. > Do you suggest that we fundamentally overturn how our entire society works just to remove cheating? Are you suggesting that university diplomas are a fundamental factor of how our society works? If so, would you please explain how? > First of all, which of these are you saying should be "removed"? Only the ones from universities? All of them? Only those from the universities. Universities are officially recognized "places to learn" and they should be kept that way. Studying for longer than "appropriate" number of years should not be frowned upon, but encouraged. The whole process of "verification" should be completely independent of learning. Bundling "learning" and "verification", the way universities do, inevitably leads to hordes of people who want verification, but not learning - i.e. cheaters. > Secondly, how do you remove them? Do you outlaw them? Very simple - stop issuing them (I suppose a country-level ban of university diplomas could do, but politics depend on the country so I can't give you a general answer). If you want a certificate authority, make a certificate authority and make it its sole purpose to verify that people have the knowledge. Leave university out of that. > Thirdly, what happens when they're all gone? How do you certify a surgeon? A certificate authority (that only verifies surgeons' skills, and doesn't bundle the process with "learning").