4 ms·
Fairly good assessment IMHO. Naturally that is a custom transformer, just not the high-voltage range that a normal tube amp requires. Looks like the physical
by fuzzfactor 4y ago
Fairly good assessment IMHO.
Naturally that is a custom transformer, just not the high-voltage range that a normal tube amp requires.
Looks like the physical layout might have been originally designed to be fully equipped for high-voltage operation, which would mean two additional audio transformers would be needed in addition to a high-voltage version of the present power transformer. Transformers are probably the most costly components to the BOM.
The PCBs would all be different too, and a hobbyist having the proper transformers could discard the present ones and completely rewire for conventional high voltage operation, probably easiest on a point-to-point basis without bothering to design an alternative HV PCB for the proper passive components needed.
If HV transformers were ever originally involved I could imagine the supply of the HV units ran out before the supply of tubes & sockets. Therefore it could have been redesigned as a solid state amp more cost-effectively using the tubes mainly for decoration and to maintain a premium pricing cache. Especially if full tube amps were originally issued and gained a decent reputation to begin with.
- ratww 4y agoOutput audio transformers would only be required if it also had a tube power amplification section, but it seems it was never advertised as being 100% tube anyway. It would also need 4 output power tubes for Stereo Class-AB operation, plus a couple of triodes for the inverter, so I don't think there's enough room there for it. If it were Class-A it would probably need much bigger tubes to deliver the wattage it promises, and there doesn't seem to be much space in the box.