4 ms·
There's no guarantee it's a solvable problem. And there's the more insidious variant of this: to solve it we need new physics. I say it's more insidious becaus
by narag 4y ago
There's no guarantee it's a solvable problem.
And there's the more insidious variant of this: to solve it we need new physics. I say it's more insidious because, if we used all the money in current approaches, we would be diverting it from the research that could really solve it.
- drran 4y agoWe need to understand the nuclei. The only way to do that is to create macro-scale working models of nuclei, to see what happens inside them. The «walking droplet» kind of experiment is a step in the right direction. These experiments are much, much cheaper than any other experiment in quantum or nuclear physics, but nobody wants to fund them.