4 ms·
> I don’t want to devalue their savings. Hallelujah! I do presume this means the /kind/ of savings or /where/ it's held is immaterial. Sometimes I like to kee
by dinom 4y ago
> I don’t want to devalue their savings.
Hallelujah! I do presume this means the /kind/ of savings or /where/ it's held is immaterial.
Sometimes I like to keep a portion of my savings as seashells in a shoe-box. But as you acknowledge...
> Not at all, it should absolutely be you,
And after all that circumlocution I was beginning to think you'd never concede. You've made my day!
- simonh 4y agoI don't see how I can concede a point I never contested, but ok. >> I don’t want to devalue their savings. >Hallelujah! I do presume this means the /kind/ of savings or /where/ it's held is immaterial. It's absolutely material, but it's their choice not mine. If they choose to invest unwisely then that can have unfortunate consequences (assuming no crime was committed, that's a different question). Can I guarantee the savings of people who unwisely invest in swamp land? No. Do you think I or anyone else should? So of course the choices people make matter, and have consequences.