3 ms·
I'm calling bullshit on most of this. You're making a lot of strong claims that are unsupported or even counterfactual. E.g.: > Most cases of myopia (nearsig
by jmull 4y ago
I'm calling bullshit on most of this.
You're making a lot of strong claims that are unsupported or even counterfactual.
E.g.:
> Most cases of myopia (nearsightness), involving progressively worsening vision, are largely due to inaccurate lens prescriptions.
Interesting idea, but what do you have to support this provocative claim?
You argument about minor corrections isn't even logical, which makes me doubt your judgement in any of this.
And it's never a good sign when the citations provided contradict the claims. [1] doesn't support the claims it's attached to. In fact, it says:
"The underlying biological cause of myopia is unknown, and there is no widely accepted means of prevention or cure."
I hope you're not really a practicing optometrist.
- goldenkey 4y agoI don't have a list of references ready for these kinds of debates but the information is out there if you even do a cursory glance. The Japanese have been the most vigilant in doing research on myopia. [1] [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32740040/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32740040/