4 ms·
Well, the patent claims design of the device, not functionality. Although this device is "fictional" and does nothing, its design (look) matches pretty much wha
by markokocic 15y ago
Well, the patent claims design of the device, not functionality. Although this device is "fictional" and does nothing, its design (look) matches pretty much what Apple is trying to patent, so it looks like Samsung has a valid case of prior art.
- jsz0 15y agoDoesn't prior art take commercial availability into consideration? (no clue if it applies to US law) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_art http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_art