3 ms·

Depends on where. I'm in Victoria and don't need a car (have one, though).

• vinay427 4y ago
  That may be the point of the comparison, as I understood it, with urban areas that don't require cars more of an exception than a norm. This is certainly the case in the US as well (NYC metro, DC metro, SF metro, university towns, etc.).
  • na85 4y ago
    Perhaps, but I'd say urban areas are the norm here. 80% of Canada lives along the Windsor-Quebec City corridor.
    • vinay427 4y ago
      I'm aware. As for the urbanization, that's about on par with the US (82% for Canada, 83% for the US according to this metric [1]). More to the point, most of those areas outside of Toronto and Montreal have middling-to-no usable public transport. For example, I was recently passing by Kingston, ON, which has buses in some parts of the city but they reach a fraction of the population in the Kingston metro area. The same goes for much of the Windsor-London corridor. The qualification I stated was "urban areas that don't require cars," not any urban area. [1] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS?locations=OE https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS?locat...
• refurb 4y ago
  I’ve been to Victoria. Plenty of places in the US you don’t need a car either by that definition.