3 ms·

>It just needs to be 1% better than human drivers. If the net result is 1% less tragedies - sign me up. Say you have a child and want to send him to school, wo

>It just needs to be 1% better than human drivers. If the net result is 1% less tragedies - sign me up. Say you have a child and want to send him to school, would you chose 1 drive him yourself, knowing you have 10 years of experience with zero accidents and you are responsible and care for your child 2 use a lottery that will give you a random driver, could be a 16 years old teen with 1 day experience, could be a 80 years old elder or a drunk or tired dude or a super driver 3 use an AI , is better then the drunk dude , 1% better then the teen but worse then you and much worse then a professional driver I am curious why would chose 2 or 3 if 1 is an option. 3

colejohnson66 4y ago
Not everyone has option 1 available to them. It’s why school buses exist.
- simion314 4y ago
  >Not everyone has option 1 available to them. It’s why school buses exist. - Not everyone has access to school bus options - not everyone can drive - not everyone owns a self driving car .... I would prefer if we stay on topic and answer at in Hypothetical question. Or if you have a bias, let use a different domain Your child is ill and you call for a doctor, but in this universe doctors are a lot of time drunk or are allowed to practice with zero experience, whyat do you chose 1 you call your family doctor that you trust and is not a drunk 2 you call the AI doctor that is terrible compared to a normal doctor but is better then the drunk doctors 3 you realize that it would be so much cheaper then creating an army of AI robot doctors to just fix the problem with drunk doctors, and maybe the fact you are an AI enthusiast won't prevent you think that comparing an AI with a drunk doctor is stupid, that we should have better stats then is better then the worse.
  - colejohnson66 4y ago
    Chill out. I never said I was an AI enthusiast. Maybe don’t assume things because someone made a small critique about your comment? I was simply responding to your question of why people choose 2 or 3 when 1 is an option. Because it’s not always an option. You even admit that at the top of your comment. Which leads me to ask: what are you trying to prove here?
    - simion314 4y ago
      I had a question, if you don't care about answering then please ignore. I am attempting to show that 1% better then a terrible calculated average is bad, it could be great for someone that is a bad driver. My problem is that averages are dragged down but drunk driving or speeding, I am fine if we implement in parallel multiple solutions, like use tech/AI to prevent illegal driving (drunk, tired, texting) and in the same tiem continue the research on actual good AI drivers that are actual good at driving.

colejohnson66 4y ago

Not everyone has option 1 available to them. It’s why school buses exist.

simion314 4y ago
>Not everyone has option 1 available to them. It’s why school buses exist. - Not everyone has access to school bus options - not everyone can drive - not everyone owns a self driving car .... I would prefer if we stay on topic and answer at in Hypothetical question. Or if you have a bias, let use a different domain Your child is ill and you call for a doctor, but in this universe doctors are a lot of time drunk or are allowed to practice with zero experience, whyat do you chose 1 you call your family doctor that you trust and is not a drunk 2 you call the AI doctor that is terrible compared to a normal doctor but is better then the drunk doctors 3 you realize that it would be so much cheaper then creating an army of AI robot doctors to just fix the problem with drunk doctors, and maybe the fact you are an AI enthusiast won't prevent you think that comparing an AI with a drunk doctor is stupid, that we should have better stats then is better then the worse.
- colejohnson66 4y ago
  Chill out. I never said I was an AI enthusiast. Maybe don’t assume things because someone made a small critique about your comment? I was simply responding to your question of why people choose 2 or 3 when 1 is an option. Because it’s not always an option. You even admit that at the top of your comment. Which leads me to ask: what are you trying to prove here?
  - simion314 4y ago
    I had a question, if you don't care about answering then please ignore. I am attempting to show that 1% better then a terrible calculated average is bad, it could be great for someone that is a bad driver. My problem is that averages are dragged down but drunk driving or speeding, I am fine if we implement in parallel multiple solutions, like use tech/AI to prevent illegal driving (drunk, tired, texting) and in the same tiem continue the research on actual good AI drivers that are actual good at driving.