3 ms·
Yes it is an impossibly high bar, and no they will not persistently get better unlike humans until they develop fully generalized AI. It's so an easy to just s
by ganbatekudasai 4y ago
Yes it is an impossibly high bar, and no they will not persistently get better unlike humans until they develop fully generalized AI.
It's so an easy to just say human drivers aren't as good, but it's not grounded in any reality.
Just take voice controlled assistants for example. We've made pretty big strides on them, haven't we?
And yet an entirely unmotivated teenager who's doing badly at school working a 7-Eleven outperforms voice assistants by several orders of magnitudes, through the sheer wonder of context clues and general intelligence, no matter how dim you want to assert that teenager to be.
I am proud of my voice assistant when it properly understood that I wanted to indeed set a timer for 50 minutes instead of 15 minutes, while any person would immediately understand what I mean even in a noisy environment just from why I'm setting the timer, and even fuzzily adjust their behavior based on what continues to happen.
Anyone who claims automated cars can fully learn the arbitrarily complicated physical situations they have to navigate around is either disingenuous, or does not know how computers work.