4 ms·
Agreed. It makes sense to me that biological life would be a transitory phase and that eventually one might be capable of moving beyond those limitations. At t
by 7thaccount 4y ago
Agreed. It makes sense to me that biological life would be a transitory phase and that eventually one might be capable of moving beyond those limitations.
At that point, all your civilization needs is lots of energy, some raw meterials, and probably a purpose, be it scientific discovery, novelty, exploration...etc. That's assuming the intelligence is anything like humanity.
- state_less 4y ago> and probably a purpose We can't help but dance in time, without reason, without rhyme.
- coenhyde 4y agoSelf replicating AI maps closer to a virus than what we consider life I think (maybe our definition is wrong). But I can't substantially articulate why. No matter how i think about it there are exceptions and examples of things we do call life that are similar to an AI. So maybe it's just my inherit bias because I am biological.
- Parallax22 4y agoYou are correct. AI needs biological life to produce energy and means of replications for it. That's how virus depends on cells of living organisms. It is concerning how some persons all around the internet keep pushing someone's narrative about humankind not having right on independent existence and having to be only a supplier of resources for the emergence of AI.