2 ms·
My point is that it's perfectly valid to argue that ownership itself is coercive.
by maxerickson 4y ago
My point is that it's perfectly valid to argue that ownership itself is coercive.
- surement 4y agoI don't think you understand what coercive means
- buttercraft 4y agoIf multiple people want to own the same thing, how do they "decide" who gets it?
- surement 4y agoThe owner of the thing decides to keep it or trade it. If there are no owners, then anyone can take it and it's not coercion.