4 ms·
Also seems related to the interesting number paradox: "the smallest uninteresting number is itself interesting because it is the smallest uninteresting number,
by yesenadam 4y ago
Also seems related to the interesting number paradox:
"the smallest uninteresting number is itself interesting because it is the smallest uninteresting number, thus producing a contradiction."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interesting_number_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interesting_number_paradox
Incidentally, the last line of that article is:
> The mathematician and philosopher Alex Bellos suggested in 2014 that a candidate for the lowest uninteresting number would be 247 because it was, at the time, "the lowest number not to have its own page on Wikipedia".
- inopinatus 4y agoperhaps resolvable by moving the self-reference to the definition e.g. "the smallest number not interesting for any other reason that its uninterestingness"