4 ms·
Maybe I was too obscure or something - there's no sign in your reply that you heard my point: that, contrary to what you said, it seems 500AD is "‘ancient’, at
by yesenadam 4y ago
Maybe I was too obscure or something - there's no sign in your reply that you heard my point: that, contrary to what you said, it seems 500AD is "‘ancient’, at least by common definitions of what ancient means."
- stakkur 4y agoMaybe you thought I was trying to respond to your point, instead of adding more information of my own.