3 ms·
Agreed, feature parity seems too high a goal to reach. But being able to peruse and even change my notes on the fly is a very attractive option, even if my main
by OrderlyTiamat 4y ago
Agreed, feature parity seems too high a goal to reach. But being able to peruse and even change my notes on the fly is a very attractive option, even if my main interaction is through emacs.
I also think the syntax is just very nice to work with and I prefer it over markdown, so having more options to use it is certainly good.
- herewulf 4y agoI use Orgzly on mobile and while I prefer emacs for any serious work, it works just well enough to capture my thoughts, URLs, etc..
- OrderlyTiamat 4y agoI've used Orgzly a while back, but I haven't gotten around to setting up sync to my notes again when I moved them. While it's great- And here again, the many sync options are amazing!- I found the interface a bit cluttered, it got in the way of simply writing what I wanted to write. That's very subjective though. It is one of the reasons I love emacs so much: there is so little interface in the way of doing what you want to do. If you like you can compile, debug, use lsp, read rss, manage your agenda, do any damn thing you want- but at its core emacs is just an extremely capable text editor that enables you to do your thing.
- wanderingmind 4y ago+1 for Orgzly. I sync the notes from Orgzly to my computer using syncthing. This way I can create outlines in Orgzly and complete details on my Computer.
- nverno 4y agoyea, embedding elisp in links, a feature I love, wouldn't be possible for example.