4 ms·
Sounds exorbitant to me. I pay roughly a tenth of that for access to the city network, at the same speed.
by yxhuvud 4y ago
Sounds exorbitant to me. I pay roughly a tenth of that for access to the city network, at the same speed.
- brailsafe 4y agoIn which city?
- yxhuvud 4y agoStockholm. Though it is paid as part of my apartment rent, and it is not opt-in but obligatory - ie bought through the house org.
- francislavoie 4y agoIn Ottawa Canada I happen to get Bell Fibe 1.5gbps for $35/month bundled with my rent. It used to be $100 for 1gbps but my building made a deal with Bell which got us great savings and an upgrade. I really can't complain. Service has been rock solid for the past 5 years with fibe. But I hate the company and the way they run their business. If I had an option for a smaller company with better support for fiber, I would switch right away. But I don't, it's a monopoly. Two companies I like a lot are Start.ca and Teksavvy, they both resell cable and DSL service and have great support staff. But since they resell, they get shafted by Rogers and Bell on service costs. The regulations are abysmal for competition here.
- slothtrop 4y agoWill always support Teksavvy (or the like) for this reason
- randomdata 4y agoHe could be rurally located. Its a similar rate for the same speed out to the farm here, which doesn't seem unreasonable when you consider how expensive it was for the ISP to bring fibre out to the farm.
- osigurdson 4y agoReally? $10/month for gigabit? Maybe I am a boiled frog.