38 ms·

He was a violent separatist, it’s not totally undeserved.

2Gkashmiri 4y ago
"violent separatist?" wow. i will repeat his statement before the sentence was handed to him. "what evidence do you have on me that i have been engaged in these activities in the last 20 years? why did 2 prime ministers of india meet me during this time? why was i allowed to visit foreign countries on an indian passport till now? where were those charges then?" so according to you, "once a violent separatist is always a violent separatist" right? is it just me or has the average indian been brainwashed by the government to make "heroes" out of terrorists like mangal pandey or even baghat singh? those individuals were charged with same crimes yet you call them your heroes but our people are "violent separatists". right. fuck you
- unmole 4y ago
  So, the JKLF hijacked a civilian aircraft, kidnapped the daughter of a Kashmiri minister and abducted and murdered a diplomat. Remind me, what did Bhagat Singh's HSRA do?
  - 2Gkashmiri 4y ago
    yeah, you are digging up something about a man which he "DID NOT DO" and want to punish 8 million people for speaking against the oppression. nice. ganga hijacking was done by hashim qureshi who is pro-india, ganga hijacking helped india liberate bangladesh because the air route was blocked or something. how is yasin malik involved in this?? classic strawman argument.
    - unmole 4y ago
      My response was to your false equivocation of JKLF and HSRA. If you want to talk about Yasin Malik, he was convincted after he pled guilty. Complaining about kangaroo courts in this instance is particularly bizzare.
  - 2Gkashmiri 4y ago
    which of these crimes did yasin malik himself committed after year 2000? he has time and again admitted about killing some 15 odd army men, thats a fact. he publicly declared to "shun violence" and has since then took part in dozens of hunger strikes. why did indian community care about him them ? why did 2 indian prime ministers meet and discuss with him? if he was such a heinous criminal as you claim him to be, isnt your problem that your politicians were charmed by him? is that so? then you are guilty of being as gullible so why care now?

"violent separatist?" wow. i will repeat his statement before the sentence was handed to him. "what evidence do you have on me that i have been engaged in these activities in the last 20 years? why did 2 prime ministers of india meet me during this time? why was i allowed to visit foreign countries on an indian passport till now? where were those charges then?" so according to you, "once a violent separatist is always a violent separatist" right? is it just me or has the average indian been brainwashed by the government to make "heroes" out of terrorists like mangal pandey or even baghat singh? those individuals were charged with same crimes yet you call them your heroes but our people are "violent separatists". right. fuck you

unmole 4y ago
So, the JKLF hijacked a civilian aircraft, kidnapped the daughter of a Kashmiri minister and abducted and murdered a diplomat. Remind me, what did Bhagat Singh's HSRA do?
- 2Gkashmiri 4y ago
  yeah, you are digging up something about a man which he "DID NOT DO" and want to punish 8 million people for speaking against the oppression. nice. ganga hijacking was done by hashim qureshi who is pro-india, ganga hijacking helped india liberate bangladesh because the air route was blocked or something. how is yasin malik involved in this?? classic strawman argument.
  - unmole 4y ago
    My response was to your false equivocation of JKLF and HSRA. If you want to talk about Yasin Malik, he was convincted after he pled guilty. Complaining about kangaroo courts in this instance is particularly bizzare.
- 2Gkashmiri 4y ago
  which of these crimes did yasin malik himself committed after year 2000? he has time and again admitted about killing some 15 odd army men, thats a fact. he publicly declared to "shun violence" and has since then took part in dozens of hunger strikes. why did indian community care about him them ? why did 2 indian prime ministers meet and discuss with him? if he was such a heinous criminal as you claim him to be, isnt your problem that your politicians were charmed by him? is that so? then you are guilty of being as gullible so why care now?