4 ms·
Great product positioning. I hope their follow-up is better than typical Google. The ML features are a good start, but I hope they get some BigQuery ML style mo
by code_biologist 4y ago
Great product positioning. I hope their follow-up is better than typical Google. The ML features are a good start, but I hope they get some BigQuery ML style model-definition-in-SQL features.
The list of supported extensions [1] is interesting and covers the biggies. Still, it always kills me that these hosted "Postgres+" solutions end up meaning no third party extensions. ZomboDB (easy ElasticSearch integration) is a PG extension I've always wanted to try, but haven't been able to.
[1] https://cloud.google.com/alloydb/docs/reference/extensions https://cloud.google.com/alloydb/docs/reference/extensions
- trhway 4y ago>Great product positioning. I hope their follow-up is better than typical Google. Looks like AlloyDB is a result of the influx of Oracle and SAP database people into GCP.
- gxt 4y agoOr theft. Gitlab private projects don't offer confidentiality from the service provider afterall...
- nlnn 4y agoIt's very frustrating. We use ZomboDB heavily, and the lack of extension support in AWS/Google cloud offerings prevents us from switching.