4 ms·

What aspect of “private company” do you not understand? No shit they have the power to censor on the platforms they control.

evandale 4y ago
>What aspect of “private company” do you not understand? The part where they're given more power than we give the government.
- ciabattabread 4y ago
  So… you want the government to interfere with the operation of private companies so they are forced to give a platform to people they don’t want to do business with… Last I checked, political beliefs are not a protected class.
  - evandale 4y ago
    I want the government to interfere with the operation of _specific_ private companies so they're forced to give a platform to everyone because of the sheer amount of traffic and eyeballs they get every single second of every single day. Facebook, Google, and Twitter come to mind first. IMO they can't be trusted with having more power than the government. They have way too much control over what people consume on the internet.
    - scarface74 4y ago
      Yes because the government would never do something like pass laws to punish a corporation because they spoke out against a policy - see Florida vs Disney. The last thing I want is to give the government more power.
throwaway0x7E6 4y ago
why do we have this thread then, and countless more like it? no shit, private companies have the power to set the compensation to whatever the fuck they want. end of story
- evandale 4y ago
  This reply is pretty hilarious when I think about it. It makes me wonder how much overlap there is between the "private companies can censor who they want" crowd and the "CEO salaries should be capped" crowd.
anonporridge 4y ago
It's perfectly understandable that a private company has the right under the current laws to do that. But that doesn't mean we can't have the social conversation over whether that's a reality we want to perpetuate. A tiny number of private companies have de facto control over what information the masses get exposed to, and to a lot of people, myself included, that just seems like an incredibly unhealthy state of affairs in the project towards an ever more vibrant civilization. We have the right to talk about it and decide to try to change the law.
- scarface74 4y ago
  So should all platforms be forced to allow any content on their platform? There is an entire internet where you can get any type of information that suits your world view.

evandale 4y ago

>What aspect of “private company” do you not understand? The part where they're given more power than we give the government.

ciabattabread 4y ago
So… you want the government to interfere with the operation of private companies so they are forced to give a platform to people they don’t want to do business with… Last I checked, political beliefs are not a protected class.
- evandale 4y ago
  I want the government to interfere with the operation of _specific_ private companies so they're forced to give a platform to everyone because of the sheer amount of traffic and eyeballs they get every single second of every single day. Facebook, Google, and Twitter come to mind first. IMO they can't be trusted with having more power than the government. They have way too much control over what people consume on the internet.
  - scarface74 4y ago
    Yes because the government would never do something like pass laws to punish a corporation because they spoke out against a policy - see Florida vs Disney. The last thing I want is to give the government more power.

throwaway0x7E6 4y ago

why do we have this thread then, and countless more like it? no shit, private companies have the power to set the compensation to whatever the fuck they want. end of story

evandale 4y ago
This reply is pretty hilarious when I think about it. It makes me wonder how much overlap there is between the "private companies can censor who they want" crowd and the "CEO salaries should be capped" crowd.

anonporridge 4y ago

It's perfectly understandable that a private company has the right under the current laws to do that. But that doesn't mean we can't have the social conversation over whether that's a reality we want to perpetuate. A tiny number of private companies have de facto control over what information the masses get exposed to, and to a lot of people, myself included, that just seems like an incredibly unhealthy state of affairs in the project towards an ever more vibrant civilization. We have the right to talk about it and decide to try to change the law.

scarface74 4y ago
So should all platforms be forced to allow any content on their platform? There is an entire internet where you can get any type of information that suits your world view.