4 ms·
Man, I can't even imagine how much better Amazon will perform, than if they'd hired a CEO who was willing to work for just $211m. EDIT: If someone has a more r
by VikingCoder 4y ago
Man, I can't even imagine how much better Amazon will perform, than if they'd hired a CEO who was willing to work for just $211m.
EDIT: If someone has a more recent, or somehow better, graph than this one [1], then I'm all ears.
[1] : https://slate.com/business/2014/07/ceo-pay-for-performance-this-graph-shows-why-it-s-a-sham.html https://slate.com/business/2014/07/ceo-pay-for-performance-t...
- celeritascelery 4y agoHow much better will you perform when they boost your pay 0.005%?
- kixiQu 4y agoYou mean how much better would I perform for an extra million dollars? How much better could I perform with a team of assistants each making six figures? Why on earth should one accept a percent-based framing of these ludicrous numbers?
- VikingCoder 4y agoWhat's $1,000,000 / $212,000,000 again? Is it 0.47%? If you're going to mock me over math, then at least don't be off by a factor of a hundred. :)
- MisterPea 4y ago?? There's a handful of people in the world with the level of insight into amazon's internals as Jassy has. And compared to most in the article, Jassy's comp is very shareholder friendly. He's paid 99% in RSUs - his income already dropped about a third from when the comp was agreed.