2 ms·
>One of the points of the paper is that constructor theory makes such statements in a way that is compatible with other known laws. Yeah, but known laws are al
by whatshisface 4y ago
>One of the points of the paper is that constructor theory makes such statements in a way that is compatible with other known laws.
Yeah, but known laws are already compatible with themselves. You might make them more comprehensible by establishing a conceptual meta-framework that offers a consistent way to phrase statements about them, but that is clearly a philosophical task.
- bordercases 4y agoThe fact it is philosophical does not make it irrelevant to physics. As such to point out the distinction here does little work. I.e. What QM interpenetration do you support and why are the others unendorseable?