> I enjoyed that read although I kinda wonder about the "The New York Times is Wrong About Hati" when the author notes that ... they're also right in general?

> I enjoyed that read although I kinda wonder about the "The New York Times is Wrong About Hati" when the author notes that ... they're also right in general? Clickbait headline for a piece by an anonymous researcher -- or an anonymous group of them -- who've complained about a "lack of credit" for the Times' source materials and have an axe (or axes) to grind with the paper.